My last blog post was on a guy a regard as one of the greatest CTOs: Vivek Kundra, CTO of the District of Columbia.
Please see that post for a short summary of some of the great things he has been doing:
Vivek Kundra: Democratizing Data and Putting it in the Public Domain
There have been dozens of other reports on Vivek lately, all very much positive. A recent one on the WTOPnews site at (District's top techie advises Obama transition) is one of many. A comment from WTOP:
But the point of this follow-on post is to talk about an article that runs Vivek Kundra down. It was in the Washington Post. I don't know why this guy wrote the piece slamming Vivek. It was totally undeserved, in my opinion. Maybe the author of the piece thinks it is cool to run people down for no reason? I just don't have a clue. I almost hate to draw your attention to what he said. It is so childish and so stupid. But I guess you should take a look. In fact, I would encourage you to read it and comment on the site and let folks know what you think. Check it out here:
Where's Firing Fenty When You Need Him?
Can you believe Marc Fisher actually suggests that mayor Fenty should fire Vivek? He seems to want him fired for exercising world class best management techniques in a highly efficient, cost-effective way. I think Fisher should issue an apology. If you think so too, please comment on Fisher's drivel.
My hesitation with the Kundramania resides solely in the results of all of his efforts. I see a lot of whiz and a lot of bang, but as a District of Columbia resident, I still not see any improvements in our city's technological infrastructure. I and many others do not use any of the Apps for Democracy (nor will I as they are not particularly useful). I think the idea was great, but there is room for improvement on the implementation and results side. To be blunt, we need CTOs that can get results.
The idea of the Digital Public Square is great idea - so now what? I would love to see how the DC government spends its money, leverages its resources in OCTO, etc., but I do not see these results yet. As technologists, a lot of us think of and have great ideas but then fail to follow through to see results. We need to start looking in that direction.
I think the press has been overwhelmingly cordial to Vivek, often providing no substantive attention to the products and the results. Why? Because they do not understand the details. Take for example the use of an internal stock mechanism to track the CTO's projects. The article does not examine the use of this system because they do not understand it. An internal systems that tracks projects like stocks is interesting, but isn't the common refrain from business leaders that stocks should be held over the long term. Vivek has been in DC only two years and picks up and trashes projects without this outlook. I cannot help but question his experience in technology and do not think it is adequate for his position. His speaking abilities and leadership qualities are incredible and he is adored by the press, but we really need to look at the results to understand how technology is helping to shape the city.
Frankly, I think one of best results coming out of OCTO was the revamped website and information architecture for the City Council. You can see the before and after picture and understand the results without the whiz and the bang.
Posted by: TM | January 07, 2009 at 03:40 PM
I think it is hard sometimes for people not in the enterprise to see the value being delivered by an enterprise CTO. I also think that non-technologists might sometimes have a hard time evaluating the contributions of CTOs. I hope that doesn't sound like I'm being arrogant, I know there are many ways for non technical people to evaluate technical people and their results and there are many ways for people from outside an enterprise to evaluate the work of enterprise technologists. But I'm trying to find a rational reason for how a variety of opinions could exist on this topic.
Maybe one thing to consider for non technologists is what it was like prior to Vivek taking the position. He has really delivered incredible new capabilities for the city's workforce. That is good for citizens. And he has not done that by busting the budget. He has been very good with the budget.
Your comments have made me think of several other points for future discussion, like how CTO-type folks should be picked, and how new generations of CTO's should be groomed and mentored. And how techies should be evaluated.
More later,
Bob
Posted by: Bob Gourley | January 08, 2009 at 06:30 PM